Part I: Introduction to Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVK)
The Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) – “Farm Science Center” – scheme is poised to play a central role in India’s sustainable agricultural development. As the chief intermediary and extension service connecting India’s National Agricultural Research System (NARS) with millions of rural farmers, the KVK model has undoubtedly shaped which agricultural innovations and farming methods have been adopted throughout rural India for the past half century.
Even so, the extent to which the KVK model can and will contribute to sustainable agricultural development in India remains uncertain. This ambiguity is partly due to a lack of academic literature and accompanying research on the subject. Additionally, challenges such as the underutilization of the KVK model by extension services, limited recognition of its potential within the National Agricultural Research System (NARS), and logistical constraints that hinder the capacity of individual KVKs to fulfill their mandate, further cast doubt on the future impact of this institution.
This uncertainty should be of particular concern to those interested in the trajectory of India’s agri-food system as a whole, given that KVKs are well-positioned to significantly influence the practices and principles adopted by rural farming communities. The model’s potential to serve as an instrument for fostering a more equitable, ecologically viable, and resilient agri-food sector warrants close attention.
What are KVKs and Why Do They Matter?
India’s KVK system was established by the Indian federal government to translate high-level agricultural research into practical applications within communities. The first KVK was founded in 1974 in Puducherry (Perunthalaivar Kamaraj Krishi Vigyan Kendra) based on recommendations from India’s Federal Education Commission, the National Planning Commission, and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).
Since then, this agricultural polytechnic model has evolved from primarily providing vocational agricultural training to rural youth, to serving as the key bridge between farmers, researchers, and extension functionaries. There are now– as of January 2025– 731 KVKs spread across India, each mandated to assess, refine, and demonstrate agricultural technologies to enhance their applicability and adoption by farmers.
“Growth of KVKs” Source https://icar.org.in/agricultural-extension-division/growth-kvks
While the primary activities and capabilities of each KVK vary, all centers are theoretically tasked with the following: conducting on-farm trials to determine the suitability of various agricultural technologies for local farming systems, organizing frontline demonstrations on farmers’ fields to showcase the productive capacity of various techniques, providing training to farmers to enhance their knowledge and skills in modern agricultural practices, and training extension personnel in relevant agricultural technological developments.
KVKs engage in targeted outreach efforts, including farmer field days, agricultural fairs, and strategic campaigns to facilitate the adoption of new technologies by farming communities. KVKs also play a hands-on role in supplying or connecting farmers with high-quality seeds and farming equipment.
To achieve these objectives, each KVK is led by a Chief Scientist, also referred to as a Program Coordinator, who is supported by a team of specialists in fields such as horticultural science, agronomy, animal husbandry, soil science, and home science.
KVKs are also organized under eleven ICAR Agricultural Technology Application Research Institutes (ATARIs) based on their respective geographic zones. Each ATARI is responsible for overseeing KVK activities, as well as monitoring and evaluating the programs conducted by the KVKs. ATARIs coordinate with state-level and central government agencies, as well as credit institutions, to ensure the successful implementation of these programs.
KVKs unique role—connecting stakeholders across the hyper-local, district, state, and federal levels—paired with the broad scope of activities they undertake, highlight the potential of this system to influence the trajectory of the India’s agri-food development. As recipients of federal funding, subject to state-level management, and tasked with disseminating knowledge in their specific regions, KVKs are well-positioned to provide smallholder farmers across India contextualized, need-based training and agricultural resources .
Even so, a series of present challenges hinder the models’ ability to yield influence within the agricultural research and extension system…
Challenges and Present Limitations to the KVK
For one, KVKs are inconsistent due to their diverse host organizations and unequal resource distribution. While the KVK program is federally funded and managed, the institutions hosting them range from agricultural universities to NGOs to state agencies. These stakeholders bring their own goals, strategies, and organizational structures, which inevitably influence how individual centers operate. Additionally, funding for different KVKs is variable, and resource constraints are often exacerbated by issues within the ATARI system itself (tasked with coordinating KVKs). ATARIs frequently struggle with understaffing or are bogged down by administrative duties. This lack of uniformity results in disparities in the training and technical support available to KVKs, affecting their ability to implement their mandate. These discrepancies also make it difficult to meaningfully assess the models’ aggregate capacity for impact.
Some researchers have also documented and analyzed how farmers perceive the efficiency and effectiveness of KVKs. One study highlighted critical logistical issues that reduce farmers’ motivation to attend training sessions. Inadequate boarding facilities for farmers and their families, insufficient communication regarding objectives of offered workshops, irregular class schedules, and minimal follow-up to provide post-training materials, were all identified as barriers to ensuring farmer participation. These factors limit the ability of KVKs to function as effective outreach and training centers.
KVKs also do not serve as primary drivers of technology transfer. Although they are designed to support the activities of extension agencies, KVKs are often sidelined at both ends of the lab-to-land continuum. Research institutes rarely consider KVKs’ technology assessments as formal research, while state development departments tend to over-utilize KVKs for various campaigns as a means of offloading their own responsibilities. This dual challenge—lack of recognition on one hand and the overextension of their resources on the other—undermines the KVKs’ ability to contribute to research or fulfill their prescribed activities.
Underlying these challenges is the unclear role KVKs play within the agricultural development sector as whole. Some view KVKs merely as event organizers focused on training sessions and workshops, rather than as institutions equipped to fulfill their broader mandate of testing and disseminating agricultural technologies. Similarly, others consider KVKs as temporary assignments rather than integral components of the agricultural research and extension system. This ambiguity is recognized by both the communities KVKs serve and the institutions they interact with or are managed by.
Those who recognize the value of the KVK model and seek to address the structural challenges which limit its performance, consistently emphasize the need for increased federal investment and operational support. Chronic underfunding and understaffing—if left unaddressed—will continue to limit the ability of respective centers to scale and proactively serve farmers.
Despite these challenges, the role KVKs play in disseminating agricultural knowledge and technology as well as conducting on-farm research, cannot be overlooked. The variety of extension activities they undertake—including hosting farmer meetings (kisan gosthi), agricultural fairs (kisan mela), seminars, field demonstrations, night meetings, self-help group (SHG) sessions, animal health camps, diagnostic visits, and celebration days—demonstrates that, even amidst constraints and regional variability, these centers are situated to enhance farmers’ access to knowledge, resources, and networks; ultimately improving their overall livelihoods.
Crucial, then, is determining which agricultural principles, practices, and technologies are given credence, who or which groups set the research agenda and activities for each KVK, and the extent and pace to which the KVK model is invested in and utilized.
Part II: KVKs as Agents of Change: Ensuring a System of Sustainability or the Industrial Status Quo?
Reviewing the Agri-Food the Crisis At Hand
Immediate and long-term food security is frequently cited as a primary concern among various stakeholders shaping agri-food policy and development in India. With a growing population of over 1.4 billion people and an agricultural sector dominated by small and marginal farmers—a majority of most of whom produce staple cash crops while grappling with challenges such as collapsing or unstable market prices, severe soil degradation, and declining groundwater availability—there is mounting pressure on farming systems to sustain crop production and improve per-acre productivity. Crises such as floods, droughts, and extreme weather events driven by climate change, along with shocks to international agricultural supply chains– whether from burgeoning geopolitical tensions or global pandemics– further the risk of worsening food insecurity in coming decades.
Such production-related challenges persist alongside pressing issues of inequitable food access and distribution—linked to food loss and waste—and the ongoing struggle for farm justice. Over the past decade, the exponential loss of livelihoods among agrarian smallholders has contributed to a sharp rise in Indian farmer suicides. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, India also witnessed the world’s longest and largest occupation movement in human history—a protest led by farmers advocating for their rights and future security.
Amid this complex web of compounding agri-food-system crises, the vast potential and uncertain trajectory of the KVKs’ role in India’s agricultural development becomes all the more critical.
The Purpose, Function, and Evolution of India’s Farm Science Centers
Despite mounting scientific and anecdotal evidence documenting the far-reaching environmental, public health, and local-economic consequences of the promotion of conventional, industrial, yield-oriented agricultural technologies—such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides, and non-native or GMO corporate-owned seeds—agronomic research generally prioritizes creating and disseminating input-oriented solutions to on-farm challenges. While horticultural and organic farming practices are on the rise throughout the country, the aforementioned modern agricultural techniques, continue to feature prominently in the state’s agenda for agricultural innovation.
This discrepancy largely reflects competing visions of what constitutes just, equitable, and sustainable rural livelihood development among various individuals and stakeholder groups.
While some emphasize improving farmers’ access to larger markets and producing high-value cash crops, others prioritize enhancing farmers’ subsistence levels and improving long-term output through organic and diverse cropping systems. Some focus attention on developing new technologies to address immediate challenges, such as pest infestations, crop diseases, or drought, as quickly and cheaply as possible. Others advocate for a shift in priorities altogether, centering food sovereignty—the right of people and communities to define their own agricultural, labor, food, and land policies in ecologically, socially, economically, and culturally appropriate ways– ahead of improving production of cash crops. Not all of these objectives are mutually exclusive, nor do they exist in a binary. Any one or combination of these objectives can, in theory, be promoted by the KVK scheme.
Indeed, poverty alleviation, environmental sustainability, and livelihood security are deeply interdependent goals that are core to the KVK mission. Yet, it is necessary to acknowledge that these divergent conceptions of how to achieve such aims are not inconsequential. Alongside the various externalities associated with over-use of chemical inputs or water-intensive practices, the promotion and implementation of symptomatic, output- oriented strategies and solutions will not serve to address the long-term challenges of climate change, automation, and corporate consolidation, which pose imminent threat to Indian farmers today.
Additionally, these differing priorities must be placed in the context upon which they evolved, as they are not only indicative of differences in educational background or sector-specific training.
The history of national GDP growth and industrialization around the world is largely a history of states pursuing policies to increase agricultural output at expense of farmers, farm laborers and the health fo the environment. Similarly, the worlds’ current international trade and monetary system– specifically as it pertains to agricultural markets– was not built to ensure a more equitable and ‘food secure’ world. Myths of benevolence and international unity cloud realties of the neocolonial and hegemonic state-agendas. In the wave of decolonization in the 20th century, governments of Western industrialized economies sought to ensure their states’ had access to consistent export markets in newly independent, developing economies. Policies were crafted to ensure post-war-time chemicals and surplus crops, could be sold abroad as agri-chemicals or dumped as ‘food aid’; forever altering the livelihoods of regional smallholders in the process. The promotion and implementation of intensive agricultural inputs and agri-tech– by and large still promoted by state agencies and conventionally-trained agronomists and agricultural biotech researchers– should not be assessed in a vacuum apart from this context.
Additionally, the ever-increasing consolidation and influence of transnational agribusinesses firms in state and federal policy, which profit hundreds of billions of dollars annually from the promotion of cheap inputs and agri-tech solutions, poses an ever-worsening threat to the livelihoods of smallholders and the long-term health of the environment.
Even the emergent ‘climate smart’ agricultural movement is characterized by a great deal ‘innovations’ that sees to address systemic problems of overproduction, land and water contamination, and farm labor exploitation, through the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) and farm robotics, hybrid seed varieties owned and patented by international agribusiness firms, and/or building mass-vertical farms as to produce food apart from soil and water. Loss of agrarian livelihoods or biodiversity en masse, is altogether overlooked in such an array of prescriptions.
It is therefore crucial that practitioners in agricultural development pursue holistic, integrated solutions that acknowledge the deep interconnections between food, livelihoods, health, and the stewardship of natural resources.
As agents of research and tools of the federal government, which integrate education, technology transfer, and problem-solving at the local level, KVKs are well-positioned to help drive systems change. Given KVKs also disseminate information and distribute resources, they exert significant influence over what is considered “progress” or “sustainable” across rural India.
KVK practitioners can incorporate traditional agricultural technologies, principles, and practices rooted in ecological modeling and whole-systems design into their framework. Agroecology, for example, offers a comprehensive, transdisciplinary approach that is well-suited for KVK integration. Agroecology bridges the ecological, cultural, technological, economic, and political dimensions from food production to consumption, with intent to honor the cyclical and interconnected relationships between natural and biological systems.
While agricultural universities, agronomists, and state-implemented schemes are only recently affirming the functional and transformative potential of agroecology, its concepts and strategies have long been practiced by smallholder farmers. Its inherently localized orientation makes agroecology particularly suited to small-scale, regionally based farming systems, as the KVK model is intended to serve.
In practice, KVKs practitioners can integrate agroecological techniques– such as crop rotation, compositing/green manuring, agroforestry, crop-livestock integration, integrated pest management, rainwater capture, and polyculture – into their repertoire of interventions. Other activities, such as establishing community seed banks and seeking to promote native seed varieties can be adopted to preserve biodiversity, ensure seed local sovereignty, reducing reliance on hybrid seeds that often must be repurchased on a seasonal or annual basis. Demonstration plots are another effective tool KVKs can use to test and showcase practices– such as intercropping, vermicomposting, and agroforestry– in action.
Notably, an orientation towards limiting farm size and promoting nature-based solutions, should not be confused with an inability to scale profits or impact. Smallholders can achieve economic viability and even increase profitability through diversifying their farms and pursuing cooperative models, in which resources, knowledge, and infrastructure is shared. These strategies can ensure resilience to market fluctuations, reduce individual investment costs, improve farmers’ bargaining power, and increase access to local and regional markets. This collective approach not only enhances the economic resilience of individual farmers but also strengthens the social fabric of rural communities, making agro ecological models well-suited for overall livelihood improvement.
Some KVKs have already explicitly drawn from agroecological principles to guide their work and/or are dedicating resources to research affiliated farming practices. For instance, certain centers have introduced “natural farming units,” where they focus on teaching farmers how to integrate crops, trees, and livestock to promote functional biodiversity.
The Consortium for Agroecological Transformations (CAT), the Bharat Agroecology Fund, National Mission for Natural Farming (NMNF), and Coalition for Food Systems Transformation in India (CoFTI) – just to name a few– also reflect non-government initiatives and networks that are seeking to transform the agri-food sector towards food and farm justice; all of which may seek to integrate KVKs as partners in driving this change.
Grassroots organizations and NGOs, in particular, should also recognize KVKs as potential collaborators. By aligning programmatic objectives and project-specific activities with KVK mandates, such as training farmers and distributing on-farm resources, organizations can seek partnerships that are mutually beneficial. Additionally, policy advocacy is often a key agenda for organizations working in the sustainable development and/or sustainable agriculture sector. KVKs should be leveraged as a platform to conduct regional research on the short and long-term benefits of these farming methods. Such data can be leveraged to secure funding for agroecological programs, and/or integrate more holistic objectives into state and federal policy frameworks.
KVKs are also well-positioned to co-create solutions with farmers by involving them in the initial research process, shifting away from top-down methods of knowledge dissemination. Traditional, experiential, and observational knowledge is a valuable resource. Rather than viewing lab-based researchers and agronomists as the sole sources of innovation, a shift in perspective—where KVKs collaborate with farmers, especially those who can serve as regional experts and educators—can ensure that solutions are context-specific and align with broader livelihood priorities.
KVKs’ access to capital and modern technology– respective to the specific center– also offers pathways to economic empowerment and improved agricultural outcomes. Integrating modern technology with traditional farming methods can enhances sustainability and resilience by optimizing practices like crop rotation and agroforestry. For example, KVK-provided soil sensors and accompanying data analysis tools can help farmers monitor erosion and test reductions based on organic interventions. KVKs can also disseminate technology that can enable smallholders to sell their products through online platforms and/or learn about new branding and packaging techniques. This will increase income opportunities beyond local markets.
For instance, some KVKs have launched mobile SMS services that deliver timely agro-advisories, weather updates, and information about government schemes directly to farmers. This digital innovation has been particularly impactful in reaching farmers in remote areas. Additionally, providing access to community-based cold storage programs or regional value-added equipment (e.g., milling, solar drying) can help farmers tap into value-added markets for raw agricultural materials, increasing their profit margins and reducing post-harvest losses. These interventions, often tied to staff training and regional support, demonstrate that with adequate investment, KVKs can help farmers navigate contemporary agricultural challenges.
The integration of traditional farming methods with modern technology could play a transformative role in the agricultural sector. By bridging the gap between agronomic research and farmers, KVKs could serve as key intervention points for system transformation. This requires structural and organizational reforms, as well as the recognition of KVKs as knowledge hubs and resource centers.
As awareness of agroecology grows and economic and socio-ecological pressures push farmers to adopt sustainable practices, various stakeholders will seek ways to collaborate and support these transitions. KVKs may play a larger, more critical role in supporting public, private, and non-governmental initiatives that takes themse aims. The KVK model is a unique resource that stakeholders across sectors—academic, nonprofit, social enterprises—can invest in and utilize to strengthen local agricultural economies and ensure environmentally sustainable food systems.
Conclusion
KVKs occupy a unique yet challenging position within the NARS. On one hand, their placement at the bottom of the research extension service hierarchy is a key limiting factor. They are often beholden to their host institutions, which may impose agendas that do not fully align with the vision of KVK staff or the specific challenges of surrounding communities. The top-down transfer of information can also hinder the autonomy of KVKs are research centers, broadly dictating their agenda.
On the other hand, KVKs’ position at the far end of the lab-to-land continuum grants them a unique opportunity to act as intermediaries between the state, academia, and communities. As KVKs are mandated to tailor training, technical demonstrations, and on-farm trials to the climatic, economic, cultural, and geographic conditions of the farming communities they serve, they stand apart from other agricultural extension systems. Leveraging the legitimacy of state oversight and access to federal funding, KVKs can assist farmers in developing solutions that prioritize the needs of their target communities at a national scale.
Those working in agri-food and rural livelihood development in the Indian subcontinent must not overlook the KVK model. It is an established yet evolving institution capable of navigating the growing divide between those prioritizing local resilience and community-based food sovereignty and those advancing output-driven schemes that prioritize economic growth at the expense of farmers and consumers. KVKs can shift this paradigm by emphasizing environmental stewardship—through crop diversification, integrated livestock management, and water conservation—and fostering resilient, localized economies.
Despite their broad mandate and material reach, KVKs remain inadequately assessed. Critical questions demand attention for researchers and advocates: Which technologies are KVKs demonstrating, and why? Who owns the inputs and technologies being distributed, and who stands to profit from their adoption? What is considered valuable knowledge, innovation, or technology? Who sets the overarching goals of the KVK model, and how are short-term and long-term objectives balanced?
The future of farmers—their livelihoods and practices—directly shapes soil health, groundwater availability, food security, public health, and climate change. As an institution with the mandate and capacity to influence India’s smallholders, KVKs play a pivotal role in shaping a more sustainable and resilient agricultural future. To realize their full potential, they must evolve as key resource centers driving equitable and ecologically sound development.
References
Agroecology India. Agroecology India, https://agroecologyindia.org/.
Bharat Agroecology Fund. Bharat Agroecology Fund, https://bharatagroecologyfund.org/.
Chakraborty, Arnab, Deborah Dutta, and Chintan Patel. “Strengthen Bridges: How Can KVKs Enable Sustainable Transitions.” Small Farm Incomes, 30 June 2022, updated 14 Feb. 2023, https://www.smallfarmincomes.in/post/kvks-enable-sustainable-transitions.
Gautam, U. S., Singh, R. K., and Kumar, A. “Krishi Vigyan Kendras Glorious Journey of Five Decades.” Indian Farming, vol. 74, no. 3, 2024, pp. 05-08. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IndFarm/article/view/149845.
ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ATARI), Jodhpur. “About Us.” ATARI Jodhpur, https://atarijodhpur.res.in/inner-page.php#:~:text=ICAR%2DAgricultural%20Technology%20Application%20Research%20Institute%20(ATARI)%2C%20Jodhpur,under%20Division%20of%20Agricultural%20Extension.
“INDIA’S FOODGRAINS PRODUCTION TOUCHED A RECORD 315.7 MILLION TONNES IN 2021-22.” Ministry of Finance, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 17 Jan. 2025, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1894899.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) Portal, https://kvk.icar.gov.in/.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) Information Portal, https://krishi.icar.gov.in/kvk.jsp.
“Krishi Vigyan Kendra.” Gujarat Vidyapith, https://www.gujaratvidyapith.org/extension/krishi-vigyan-kendra.
“Krishi Vigyan Kendra Gandhinagar – Extension.” Gujarat Vidyapith, https://www.gujaratvidyapith.org/extension/krishi-vigyan-kendra.
Krishi Vigyan Kendra Lawngtlai. “Role of KVK.” Krishi Vigyan Kendra Lawngtlai, https://kvklawngtlai.mizoram.gov.in/uploads/attachments/2023/04/8e56d0af179ede53ca16927408b18f4f/role-of-kvk.pdf.
Kumar, Sunil, Hari Nandan Prasad, and Ram Kishor. “A Study of the Problems Being Faced by the Participant Farmers and Instructors and to Suggest Strategies to Make Krishi Vigyan Kendra More Beneficial.” Department of Agricultural Extension, S.V.P.U.A. & T., Meerut, 250110 (U.P.), India; and Department of Agricultural Extension, C.S.A.U.A. & T., Kanpur, 208002 (U.P.), India. CABI Digital Library, https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20173083051.
Kumar, Sunil, Lakhan Singh, Ravindra Singh, S. Ramalakshmi, Devi Krishi, and Vigyan Kendra. “Agro Ecological Approaches for Strengthening of Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) in India.” ResearchGate, 2020, pp. 75-80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349731200_Agro_Ecological_Approaches_for_Strengthening_of_Krishi_Vigyan_Kendras_KVKs_in_India.
“Natural Farming Programme.” KVK Patan, www.kvkpatan.in/detail/702208/natural-farming-programme.
Poonam, Rathore Surya. “An Analysis of Constraints as Perceived by KVK Managers for Effective Functioning of Krishi Vigyan Kendras.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 51, no. 3, 2017, pp. 277-281. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v51i03.7918.
Qureshi, Arshi. “Statistics 2011-2021: Farmer Suicides in India.” IndiaTracker, 20 Sept. 2022, https://www.indiatracker.in/story/statistics-2011-2021-farmer-suicides-in-india.
United Nations India. “Nutrition and Food Security.” United Nations India, https://india.un.org/en/171969-nutrition-and-food-security.
Yadav, Raja, Kuppusamy Ponnusamy, Hans Meena, and Kalyan Mandi. “The Constraints Experienced by Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) Trainees in Forming Entrepreneurial Units.” Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2020, pp. 112-117. doi: 10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i1530724.
